be more explicit

[www.git] / services.html

diff --git a/services.html b/services.html
index 22f6106..8a3e59f 100644 (file)
--- a/services.html
+++ b/services.html
@@ -204,6 +204,16 @@
   </tr>
 
   <tr>
+    <td>Private mailing list for large providers</td>
+    <td STYLE="background-color: #EEEEEE"><span class="no">&#x2716;</span></td>
+    <td><span class="no">&#x2716;</span></td>
+    <td><span class="yes">&#x2714;</span></td>
+    <td><span class="yes">&#x2714;</span></td>
+    <td STYLE="background-color: #F0F0F0"><span class="yes">&#x2714;</span></td>
+    <td STYLE="background-color: #F0F0F0"><span class="yes">&#x2714;</span></td>
+  </tr>
+
+  <tr>
     <td>Customization hours per month<br>(with "rollover" for unused time)</td>
     <td STYLE="background-color: #EEEEEE"><span class="no">&#x2716;</span></td>
     <td><span class="smyes">2&frac12; hours</span></td>
@@ -315,12 +325,11 @@
             into Freeside for tax calculation.
             </p>
 -->
-          <p><b>LRN lookup for US voice providers</b> - <b class="h6">$0.0002/lookup, no minimums or fees</b> (more than 500,000 calls/month?   <a href="mailto:sales@freeside.biz">contact us</a> for pricing)<br>
-            This service for US voice providers allows for query access to the
-            LNP (local number portability) database.  This ensures accurate
-            rating when not charging a single flat per-minute rate for all US
-            calls.  It also allows an actual determination of interstate vs.
-            intrastate revenue, potentially reducing taxes compared to
+          <p><b>LRN lookup for US voice providers</b> - <b class="h6">$0.0002/lookup</b> (more than 500,000 calls/month?   <a href="mailto:sales@freeside.biz">contact us</a> for pricing)<br>
+            Access to the LNP (local number portability) database ensures
+            accurate rating when not charging a single flat per-minute rate for
+            all US calls.  It also allows an actual determination of interstate
+            vs. intrastate revenue, potentially reducing taxes owen compared to
             using the FCC safe harbor percentage.
       </td>
     </tr>