check_number

diff --git a/BatchPayment/Item.pm b/BatchPayment/Item.pm
index c929cf3..d9a3ec7 100644 (file)
--- a/BatchPayment/Item.pm
+++ b/BatchPayment/Item.pm
@@ -43,9 +43,8 @@ has action => (
 
 =item payment_type
 
 
 =item payment_type
 

-"CC" or "ECHECK".  Most processors will only support 
-one or the other, and if set on the BBP::Processor object, this is not
-required.
+"CC" or "ECHECK".  Most processors will only support one or the other, 
+and if set on the Processor object, this is not required.

 
 =cut
 
 
 =cut
 


@@ -240,6 +239,11 @@ other operations on the transaction, like voiding or refunding it.
 The authorization code, probably only meaningful for credit cards.  
 Should be undef (or not present) if the transaction wasn't approved.
 
 The authorization code, probably only meaningful for credit cards.  
 Should be undef (or not present) if the transaction wasn't approved.
 

+=item check_number
+
+The check number, probably only meaningful if this transaction was
+processed from a paper check.
+

 =item assigned_token
 
 In tokenized systems which store the customer's account number or 
 =item assigned_token
 
 In tokenized systems which store the customer's account number or 


@@ -267,6 +271,8 @@ has [qw(
   assigned_token
 )] => ( is => 'rw', isa => 'Str');
 
   assigned_token
 )] => ( is => 'rw', isa => 'Str');
 

+has check_number => ( is => 'rw', isa => 'Int' );
+

 __PACKAGE__->meta->make_immutable;
 
 1;
 __PACKAGE__->meta->make_immutable;
 
 1;