From 378bd3dcbe67b0ea00ab65aca2c59ff777137469 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: ivan <ivan>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 20:58:25 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] legacy agent_custid field should be as searchable as actual
 custnum, right?  at least if it is a number...

---
 FS/FS/cust_main.pm | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/FS/FS/cust_main.pm b/FS/FS/cust_main.pm
index b5e689233..952aa73c2 100644
--- a/FS/FS/cust_main.pm
+++ b/FS/FS/cust_main.pm
@@ -5289,6 +5289,9 @@ sub smart_search {
     }
 
   } elsif ( $search =~ /^\s*(\d+)\s*$/ ) { # customer # search
+                                           # (also try agent_custid)
+                                           # (regex needs tweaking if your
+                                           #  legacy cust numbers have letters)
 
     push @cust_main, qsearch( {
       'table'     => 'cust_main',
@@ -5296,6 +5299,12 @@ sub smart_search {
       'extra_sql' => " AND $agentnums_sql", #agent virtualization
     } );
 
+    push @cust_main, qsearch( {
+      'table'     => 'cust_main',
+      'hashref'   => { 'agent_custid' => $1, %options },
+      'extra_sql' => " AND $agentnums_sql", #agent virtualization
+    } );
+
   } elsif ( $search =~ /^\s*(\S.*\S)\s+\((.+), ([^,]+)\)\s*$/ ) {
 
     my($company, $last, $first) = ( $1, $2, $3 );
-- 
2.11.0