From cc258d677cd8904e52a254b1bcce120f253ee26b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Wells Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 00:25:42 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] check_number --- BatchPayment/Item.pm | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/BatchPayment/Item.pm b/BatchPayment/Item.pm index c929cf3..d9a3ec7 100644 --- a/BatchPayment/Item.pm +++ b/BatchPayment/Item.pm @@ -43,9 +43,8 @@ has action => ( =item payment_type -"CC" or "ECHECK". Most processors will only support -one or the other, and if set on the BBP::Processor object, this is not -required. +"CC" or "ECHECK". Most processors will only support one or the other, +and if set on the Processor object, this is not required. =cut @@ -240,6 +239,11 @@ other operations on the transaction, like voiding or refunding it. The authorization code, probably only meaningful for credit cards. Should be undef (or not present) if the transaction wasn't approved. +=item check_number + +The check number, probably only meaningful if this transaction was +processed from a paper check. + =item assigned_token In tokenized systems which store the customer's account number or @@ -267,6 +271,8 @@ has [qw( assigned_token )] => ( is => 'rw', isa => 'Str'); +has check_number => ( is => 'rw', isa => 'Int' ); + __PACKAGE__->meta->make_immutable; 1; -- 2.11.0