legacy agent_custid field should be as searchable as actual custnum, right? at least if it is a number...

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/FS/FS/cust_main.pm b/FS/FS/cust_main.pm
index db7d88a60..2a951cae6 100644
--- a/FS/FS/cust_main.pm
+++ b/FS/FS/cust_main.pm
@@ -4629,6 +4629,9 @@ sub smart_search {
     }
 
   } elsif ( $search =~ /^\s*(\d+)\s*$/ ) { # customer # search
+                                           # (also try agent_custid)
+                                           # (regex needs tweaking if your
+                                           #  legacy cust numbers have letters)
 
     push @cust_main, qsearch( {
       'table'     => 'cust_main',
@@ -4636,6 +4639,12 @@ sub smart_search {
       'extra_sql' => " AND $agentnums_sql", #agent virtualization
     } );
 
+    push @cust_main, qsearch( {
+      'table'     => 'cust_main',
+      'hashref'   => { 'agent_custid' => $1, %options },
+      'extra_sql' => " AND $agentnums_sql", #agent virtualization
+    } );
+
   } elsif ( $search =~ /^\s*(\S.*\S)\s+\((.+), ([^,]+)\)\s*$/ ) {
 
     my($company, $last, $first) = ( $1, $2, $3 );